Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
SubtotalтВ╣0
TotalтВ╣0
Examoogle тАв User тАв info@examoogle.com тАв EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 тАв Page 1 of 248ЁЯФТ Protected PDF тАв Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
All of the following are examples of inappropriate practices in engineering economics except which one?
Using faulty or inaccurate data
Failing to bring attention to a potential safety problem in the project due to fear of retribution
When weighing alternatives, using optimistic estimates for one alternative while using pessimistic estimates for others
Identifying all feasible alternatives for a given project
Identifying all feasible alternatives for a given project
In engineering economics, the systematic identification of all feasible alternatives is a fundamental requirement for sound decision-making and ethical practice. Conversely, using faulty data, suppressing safety concerns, or intentionally biasing estimates constitutes unethical or poor professional practice.
In engineering economics, the systematic identification of all feasible alternatives is a fundamental requirement for sound decision-making and ethical practice. Conversely, using faulty data, suppressing safety concerns, or intentionally biasing estimates constitutes unethical or poor professional practice.
NPV=тИСt=0nтАЛ(1+i)tRtтАЛтАЛ тАФ Net Present Value for comparing economic alternatives
EUA=(1+i)nтИТ1P(i(1+i)n)тАЛ тАФ Equivalent Uniform Annual cost method
Engineering economic analysis requires a comprehensive, transparent, and objective evaluation of all possible solutions to ensure the selection of the most cost-effective and safe alternative. Ignoring viable alternatives leads to incomplete analysis, whereas introducing biased inputs (skewed estimates) leads to invalid financial projections.
Transparency and accuracy are ethical imperatives in professional engineering.
Comprehensive alternative generation prevents missing optimal project paths.
Data integrity is the foundation of B/C (Benefit-Cost) ratio calculations.
Safety is paramount and non-negotiable in economic trade-off analysis.
Comprehensive analysis leads to optimal resource allocation.
Identification of hidden risks through diverse alternative scrutiny.
Extensive alternative analysis may increase project preparation time.
Complexity in data gathering for all feasible options.
Capital budgeting in infrastructure projects.
Selection of energy systems (Solar vs. Thermal vs. Hydro).
Equipment replacement decisions in manufacturing.
Ethics in engineering economics are governed by codes established by bodies like IEEE or ASME.
Option A, B, and C represent forms of professional negligence or malfeasance that compromise the integrity of the economic study.
D is correct тАФ Identifying all feasible alternatives is a best practice in engineering economics, while the other options represent unethical or flawed methodologies.
Always approach economics questions with an 'Objectivity First' mindset. If an action increases bias or reduces transparency, it is almost certainly an inappropriate practice.