Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Corona loss by the hollow conductors because
Current density is reduced
Eddy current in the conductor is eliminated
For a given cross section, radius of conductor is increased
Of better ventilation in the conductor
For a given cross section, radius of conductor is increased
Corona loss is directly related to the surface electric field intensity of the conductor. By using hollow conductors, the effective radius (r) of the conductor is increased for the same cross-sectional area, which reduces the surface potential gradient and consequently the corona loss.
Corona loss is directly related to the surface electric field intensity of the conductor. By using hollow conductors, the effective radius (r) of the conductor is increased for the same cross-sectional area, which reduces the surface potential gradient and consequently the corona loss.
VcтАЛ=g0тАЛтЛЕ╬┤тЛЕrтЛЕln(rdтАЛ) тАФ Disruptive critical voltage formula where r is the radius.
PcтАЛтИЭ(VтИТVcтАЛ)2 тАФ Corona power loss proportional to the square of voltage excess.
The visual and electrical discharge known as corona occurs when the voltage gradient at the conductor surface exceeds the breakdown strength of air. According to Peek's law, corona loss is proportional to (VтИТVcтАЛ)2, where VcтАЛ is the disruptive critical voltage. VcтАЛ is proportional to the radius of the conductor; thus, increasing the radius through hollow construction raises the disruptive voltage threshold, decreasing power loss.
Corona loss is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the ratio of spacing to radius.
Hollow conductors are primarily used in EHV/UHV lines to manage corona discharge.
Increasing the radius reduces the surface voltage gradient (E=V/(rln(d/r))).
Reduces corona loss significantly
Reduces radio interference
Reduces electromagnetic noise
Higher manufacturing complexity
Mechanical strength is lower compared to solid conductors of equal diameter
Extra High Voltage (EHV) transmission lines
Ultra High Voltage (UHV) transmission lines
Option A is incorrect because current density reduction is a consequence of increased area, but for fixed cross-section, hollow design specifically targets radius.
Option B is incorrect as hollow conductors do not eliminate eddy currents; they might even influence skin effect distributions.
C is correct тАФ Increasing the conductor radius for a given cross-sectional area reduces the surface potential gradient, which effectively minimizes corona loss.
Always remember that corona is a surface phenomenon; any design modification that lowers the surface electric field intensity without increasing the total conductor volume will help mitigate it.