Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Power loss due to corona is directly proportional to
Spacing between conductors
Radius of conductor
Supply frequency
None of above
Supply frequency
Corona power loss (PcтАЛ) is directly proportional to the supply frequency (f) ┬╖ This relationship is derived from Peek's formula, which shows that ionization losses per cycle increase linearly with the frequency of the alternating voltage supply.
Corona power loss (PcтАЛ) is directly proportional to the supply frequency (f) ┬╖ This relationship is derived from Peek's formula, which shows that ionization losses per cycle increase linearly with the frequency of the alternating voltage supply.
PcтАЛ=242.2├Ч╬┤f+25тАЛdrтАЛтАЛ(VтИТVcтАЛ)2├Ч10тИТ5 тАФ Peek's formula for corona loss
PcтАЛтИЭf тАФ Proportionality relationship
Corona is an electrical discharge caused by the ionization of fluid surrounding a conductor ┬╖ As the frequency increases, the number of cycles per second increases, meaning the air around the conductor undergoes ionization and de-ionization processes more frequently, leading to higher cumulative energy dissipation per unit time.
Corona loss is observed to be directly proportional to (f+25), where f is in Hertz.
Higher frequency leads to a greater number of ionization cycles per second, increasing the heat and noise dissipation.
Corona is more prevalent in HV and EHV lines where the surface electric field intensity exceeds the dielectric strength of air.
Used as a natural indicator of line insulation stress.
Prevents transient overvoltages by dissipating energy during surges.
Causes power loss in transmission lines.
Leads to radio and television interference due to harmonic generation.
Produces ozone, causing corrosion of conductors.
Design of high voltage transmission lines.
Used in electrostatic precipitators and laser printers.
Dielectric strength of air at NTP is approximately $30 kV_{peak}/cm (or \21.1 kV_{rms}/cm$).
Option A is incorrect because increasing spacing between conductors increases the distance, which actually reduces the potential gradient and thus reduces corona loss.
Option B is incorrect because increasing the radius (r) of the conductor reduces the electric field intensity (E=V/rln(D/r)), thereby reducing corona loss.
C is correct тАФ Power loss due to corona increases linearly with an increase in the frequency of the power supply as defined by Peek's formula.
Remember that while corona increases with frequency, it is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the conductor spacing (D) and decreases with an increase in conductor radius (r).