Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
SubtotalтВ╣0
TotalтВ╣0
Examoogle тАв User тАв info@examoogle.com тАв EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 тАв Page 1 of 248ЁЯФТ Protected PDF тАв Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Should all schools make yoga mandatory? Arguments: I. Yes, it improves physical and mental health of students. II. No, it is not suitable for all students due to varied physical conditions. Decide which argument is strong.
Only I is strong
Only II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
A strong argument must be both relevant to the statement and provide a logical justification for or against it, even if the arguments reflect opposing viewpoints.
A strong argument must be both relevant to the statement and provide a logical justification for or against it, even if the arguments reflect opposing viewpoints.
Analyze Argument I
Argument I states that yoga improves physical and mental health. This is a positive, universally recognized benefit of yoga, making it a strong supporting argument for the policy.
Analyze Argument II
Argument II highlights a practical concern regarding accessibility and individual health variations. Because it raises a valid feasibility concern based on diverse physical capabilities, it serves as a strong counter-argument.
A: It ignores the validity of Argument II. B: It ignores the validity of Argument I. D: It wrongly dismisses both arguments, even though both offer relevant, logically sound points regarding the implementation of the policy.
C is correct because Argument I provides a valid benefit of the proposal and Argument II identifies a legitimate practical limitation, making both strong points of view.
In 'Strong vs Weak' arguments, an argument is strong if it is directly related to the issue and provides a logical reason. Don't worry if arguments are contradictory; both can be 'strong' simultaneously if they address different valid aspects of the topic.