Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Statement: Should the government ban the use of plastic bags entirely? Arguments: I. Yes, it will significantly reduce environmental pollution. II. No, it will cause huge economic losses to small traders and manufacturers.
Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong
Evaluate arguments based on social impact vs economic consequence; if both address major practical aspects of the policy change, both are considered strong.
Evaluate arguments based on social impact vs economic consequence; if both address major practical aspects of the policy change, both are considered strong.
Analyze Argument I
Argument I focuses on environmental impact. Reducing pollution is a major national concern and a primary objective of government policy, making this a logically strong argument in favor of the ban.
Analyze Argument II
Argument II focuses on the economic impact. Significant disruption to small-scale traders and the manufacturing sector is a valid, practical concern that any policymaker must weigh before implementing a ban, making it a strong argument against the ban.
Conclusion Verification
Since both arguments address relevant and significant consequences of the proposed policyтАФenvironmental health versus economic stabilityтАФboth are considered strong in the context of logical debate.
A: It ignores the valid economic concerns of the affected traders. B: It ignores the critical environmental benefits of the ban. D: It wrongly suggests that both sides of a major policy debate lack merit, which is incorrect.
C is correct because both arguments present significant and relevant consequences (environmental health vs. economic stability) that are essential to consider for a balanced policy decision.
In 'Statement and Argument' questions, always look for arguments that touch upon direct, realistic consequences. If both sides offer valid, non-fallacious viewpoints on a real-world issue, choose 'Both are strong'.