Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
The Supreme Court dismissed which state's plea to halt Karnataka's Mekedatu project in November 2025?
Tamil Nadu
Goa
Maharashtra
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
In November 2025, the Supreme Court dismissed Tamil Nadu's plea challenging Karnataka's proposed Mekedatu balancing reservoir project.
The Mekedatu project is a long-standing dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu regarding water-sharing on the Cauvery River. Tamil Nadu challenged the Central Water Commission's (CWC) permission for Karnataka to prepare a Detailed Project Report (DPR), citing concerns over reduced water flow for its farmers. The Supreme Court declared the plea premature, emphasizing that technical water-sharing and feasibility studies must be decided by expert bodies like the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA). The court maintained that Karnataka remains legally obligated to ensure water releases to Tamil Nadu as per earlier judicial directions.
The Cauvery water dispute is governed by the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, which empowers the central government to set up tribunals for adjudication. Article 262 of the Indian Constitution provides the framework for the adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-state rivers or river valleys, excluding the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in such matters, though the Court acts as an appellate authority under specific legal provisions.
Date of Supreme Court ruling: November 13, 2025
Proposed project location: Kanakapura, Bengaluru South district (Karnataka-Tamil Nadu border)
Primary regulatory bodies involved: Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) and Cauvery Water Regulation Committee (CWRC)
Judicial bench head: Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud
A is correct тАФ The Supreme Court dismissed Tamil Nadu's plea against the Mekedatu dam project in November 2025, deeming the challenge premature.
Remember 'Mekedatu' involves the Cauvery river system; remember it as a 'balancing reservoir' project meant for Bengaluru's drinking water needs, which is the primary justification cited by Karnataka.