Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
SubtotalтВ╣0
TotalтВ╣0
Examoogle тАв User тАв info@examoogle.com тАв EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 тАв Page 1 of 248ЁЯФТ Protected PDF тАв Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Given below is a cause followed by possible effects numbered I and II. Read the cause carefully and decide which of the two can be a/the possible effect(s). Cause - Inflation is an increase in the general price level of goods and services in an economy. More jobs and higher wages increase household incomes and lead to a rise in consumer spending, further increasing aggregate demand and the scope for firms to increase the prices of their goods and services. When this happens across a large number of businesses and sectors, this leads to an increase in inflation. Effect I - In an inflationary environment, unevenly rising prices inevitably reduce the purchasing power of some consumers. Effect II - Those with wealth tend to inherit more and as they have managed to put aside money and invest surpluses, they will be least damaged by any rampant inflation in the economy.
Only II is a possible effect.
Neither I nor II are possible effects.
Only I is a possible effect.
Both I and II are possible effects.
Only I is a possible effect.
Analyze each statement independently based on the definition of inflation and its socio-economic impact: Effect I describes a direct consequence of price instability, and Effect II describes a known behavioral/economic hedge for the wealthy.
Analyze each statement independently based on the definition of inflation and its socio-economic impact: Effect I describes a direct consequence of price instability, and Effect II describes a known behavioral/economic hedge for the wealthy.
Analyze Effect I
Effect I states that inflation reduces purchasing power. This is a fundamental economic truth because when prices rise, the amount of goods/services a unit of currency can buy decreases, hurting consumers, particularly those with fixed incomes.
Analyze Effect II
Effect II states that the wealthy are better positioned to protect themselves from inflation. This is also logical, as wealth allows for investment in inflation-hedging assets (real estate, equity, gold), which preserves value better than cash during inflationary periods.
Conclusion
Both statements represent logical, real-world consequences and behaviors resulting from an inflationary economic environment as described in the cause.
A: Incorrect because Effect II is also a valid logical consequence. B: Incorrect because Effect I is a valid consequence. D: Incorrect because neither statement is illogical; both are standard economic observations.
C is correct because both statements represent logical socio-economic consequences derived directly from the definition and impact of an inflationary environment.
In Cause-Effect reasoning, always evaluate if the effects are logical, evidence-based consequences of the cause provided, even if they aren't directly stated in the prompt text.
Get instant step-by-step AI explanations, full shift Previous Year Papers (SSC GD, RRB, SSC JE), and regional rank analysis on the official Examoogle App.
Free Download тАв 100K+ Aspirants