Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Statements:
No books are gadgets.
Some gadgets are tools.
Which conclusion logically follows?
Some books are tools
All tools are gadgets
Some tools are books
Cannot say
Cannot say
In Syllogism, identify if a link exists between the subjects of the conclusion. Since 'Books' and 'Tools' have no defined relationship in the statements, no definite conclusion can be drawn between them.
In Syllogism, identify if a link exists between the subjects of the conclusion. Since 'Books' and 'Tools' have no defined relationship in the statements, no definite conclusion can be drawn between them.
Analyze Statement Relationships
Statement 1: Books and Gadgets are disjoint. Statement 2: Some Gadgets are Tools. This creates a chain: Books тЖТ Gadgets <- Tools.
Evaluate Relationship between Books and Tools
While some Gadgets are Tools, we have no information about the portion of Gadgets that are Tools. They might overlap with the 'Books' category or stay entirely away from it. Since no direct relationship is established between Books and Tools, any definite conclusion is logically invalid.
A: It is possible but not certain, as the set of tools overlapping with gadgets may or may not overlap with books. B: This is a fallacy; the statement only says some gadgets are tools, not that all tools are gadgets. C: Similar to A, this is a possibility, not a logical necessity.
D is correct because there is no direct logical connection established between books and tools based on the given statements.
If the statements do not provide a direct bridge between two subjects, always look for 'Cannot say' or 'Does not follow' as the safest conclusion.