Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Neither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Only conclusion (I) follows
Only conclusion (II) follows
Either conclusion (I) or (II) follows
Both conclusions (I) and (II) follow
Either conclusion (I) or (II) follows
In syllogisms with 'No' statements, if all terms are isolated from the middle term, no positive relationship exists. Use the Venn diagram check to see if any conclusion forces a connection that isn't supported.
In syllogisms with 'No' statements, if all terms are isolated from the middle term, no positive relationship exists. Use the Venn diagram check to see if any conclusion forces a connection that isn't supported.
Analyze Statement 1 & 2
No statue is a book. No book is a copy. Both 'Statue' and 'Copy' have a negative relationship with 'Book', but no direct relationship is defined between 'Statue' and 'Copy'.
Evaluate Conclusion I
'No copy is a statue.' This is not necessarily true because the statements do not prevent an overlap between Statue and Copy. Since it's not definitely true, it doesn't follow.
Evaluate Conclusion II
'Some books are statues.' The statement 'No statue is a book' directly contradicts this. Therefore, this is definitely false.
B: Conclusion I is not necessarily true, C: Conclusion II is explicitly false, D: Both are false, not true.
A is correct because neither conclusion is logically derived from the given statements; there is no relationship defined between statue and copy, and the second conclusion directly contradicts the first statement.
In 'No A is B' and 'No B is C' scenarios, never assume a relationship between A and C. They could overlap, be separate, or one could be inside the other; only 'No' statements about their direct connections are certain.