Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
Subtotal₹0
Total₹0
Examoogle • User • info@examoogle.com • EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 • Page 1 of 248🔒 Protected PDF • Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Decentralized control system is used for larger power system because
Centralized system is not possible
Centralized control is more inefficient than decentralized control
Modern LFC algorithm is difficult to implement in centralized manner
All of above
Modern LFC algorithm is difficult to implement in centralized manner
Quick Summary: Decentralized control is preferred in modern large-scale power systems because the computational complexity and data communication requirements of a single centralized controller become unmanageable as the number of nodes increases. Decentralized systems distribute the Load Frequency Control (LFC) tasks across multiple regional control areas, enhancing system reliability, scalability, and reducing the impact of a single-point failure.
Decentralized control is preferred in modern large-scale power systems because the computational complexity and data communication requirements of a single centralized controller become unmanageable as the number of nodes increases. Decentralized systems distribute the Load Frequency Control (LFC) tasks across multiple regional control areas, enhancing system reliability, scalability, and reducing the impact of a single-point failure.
ACEi=ΔPtie,i+BiΔfi — represents the Area Control Error for control area i, which is minimized locally in decentralized control.
In a centralized system, all area control errors (ACE) must be transmitted to a single master controller, creating a communication bottleneck and latency issues as the power system expands. Decentralized control uses autonomous controllers in each area to regulate local power generation to match load demands, communicating only minimal information with adjacent areas via tie-line monitoring. This ensures that the LFC algorithms operate locally, keeping the control action fast and robust against signal delay or communication failure.
Decentralized control reduces communication overhead significantly in geographically spread systems.
The system exhibits higher resilience because the failure of one controller does not collapse the entire grid.
LFC algorithms in a centralized setup suffer from high dimensionality (curse of dimensionality) as the number of generating units increases.
Modern power systems integrate high penetration of renewable energy, requiring fast-acting local control.
Reduced communication latency and bandwidth requirements.
Improved scalability and fault tolerance of the grid.
Parallel processing of local LFC signals.
Potential for sub-optimal global performance compared to an ideal centralized model.
Increased complexity in coordinating tie-line flows between autonomous control areas.
Interconnected multi-area power grids.
Smart microgrids requiring independent operation.
LFC is also known as Automatic Generation Control (AGC) in power system terminology.
Option A is incorrect because a centralized system is technically possible but practically inefficient for massive grids.
Option B is incorrect because centralized systems are theoretically optimal but practically infeasible due to the complexity of the control law.
C is correct — Modern LFC algorithms involve complex dynamic models where centralized implementation leads to communication bottlenecks and prohibitive computational overhead in large-scale interconnected grids.
Always remember that in power systems, whenever the size of the system (number of state variables) grows significantly, centralized control architectures become bottlenecks, necessitating distributed or decentralized approaches.