Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
SubtotalтВ╣0
TotalтВ╣0
Examoogle тАв User тАв info@examoogle.com тАв EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 тАв Page 1 of 248ЁЯФТ Protected PDF тАв Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some phones are tablets. Some tablets are laptops. Conclusion 1: Some laptops are phones. Conclusion 2: No phone is a laptop.
Both conclusion (1) and conclusion (2) follow
Only conclusion (1) follows
Only conclusion (2) follows
None of the conclusions follow
None of the conclusions follow
In syllogisms, unless there is a definite relationship stated, any direct link or exclusion between the first and last element (Phones and Laptops) cannot be considered definitively true.
In syllogisms, unless there is a definite relationship stated, any direct link or exclusion between the first and last element (Phones and Laptops) cannot be considered definitively true.
Analyze the Statements
Statements: (1) Some Phones are Tablets. (2) Some Tablets are Laptops. This establishes a link between Phones-Tablets and Tablets-Laptops, but no direct link is established between Phones and Laptops.
Evaluate Conclusion 1
Conclusion 1 (Some Laptops are Phones) is not necessarily true because the shared category (Tablets) does not force an overlap between Phones and Laptops.
Evaluate Conclusion 2
Conclusion 2 (No Phone is a Laptop) is not necessarily true because it is possible to draw a Venn diagram where some Phones overlap with Laptops while still satisfying the statements.
Determine Complementary Pair
Since the status of 'Phones vs Laptops' is uncertain (either some might be or none might be), the relationship is 'Possibility' rather than 'Certainty'. Neither conclusion is definitely true.
A: Both cannot follow because one claims a relationship and the other claims no relationship, but both are uncertain; B: Only 1 does not follow because there is no direct evidence; C: Only 2 does not follow because there is no definite exclusion.
D is correct because the relationship between phones and laptops is indeterminate, meaning neither a positive nor a negative conclusion can be definitively established from the given statements.
When the middle term (Tablets) is the connector, do not assume a transitive relationship between the extremes (Phones and Laptops) unless specified by universal quantifiers.
Get instant step-by-step AI explanations, full shift Previous Year Papers (SSC GD, RRB, SSC JE), and regional rank analysis on the official Examoogle App.
Free Download тАв 100K+ Aspirants