Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements. Statements: тАв Some curlers are serums. тАв Some curlers are oils. Conclusion (I): No oil is a serum. Conclusion (II): All oils are serums.
Neither Conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Only Conclusion (I) follows
Both Conclusions (I) and (II) follow
Only Conclusion (II) follows
Neither Conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Visualize individual overlapping sets: Since there is no statement defining the direct relationship between serums and oils, their connection remains possible but not certain, rendering definite conclusions false.
Visualize individual overlapping sets: Since there is no statement defining the direct relationship between serums and oils, their connection remains possible but not certain, rendering definite conclusions false.
Analyze Statements
Statements: (1) Some curlers are serums, (2) Some curlers are oils. This means Curler set overlaps with Serum set and Curler set overlaps with Oil set. The relationship between Serum set and Oil set is not defined.
Evaluate Conclusions
Conclusion I (No oil is a serum) is not necessarily true because they could overlap in the curler region. Conclusion II (All oils are serums) is not necessarily true because they could be separate or partially overlapping.
B: Incorrect because Conclusion I is not definitely true; C: Incorrect because neither conclusion is logically necessitated; D: Incorrect because Conclusion II is not definitely true.
A is correct because neither conclusion follows from the given statements as the relationship between serums and oils is indeterminate.
In Syllogisms, if two categories are linked only via a common middle term, they have no direct logical relationship unless explicitly stated, making 'definite' conclusions regarding their relationship invalid.