Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
or with email
Your Cart
SubtotalтВ╣0
TotalтВ╣0
Examoogle тАв User тАв info@examoogle.com тАв EE-2024-8821
Chapter 1 of 12 тАв Page 1 of 248ЁЯФТ Protected PDF тАв Watermarked
Join 60,000+ competitive exam aspirants
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some guitars are drums. Some drums are violins. No drum is a flute. Conclusion (I): No flute is a violin. Conclusion (II): Some flutes are guitars.
Neither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Only conclusion (II) follows
Both conclusions (I) and (II) follow
Only conclusion (I) follows
Neither conclusion (I) nor (II) follows
Identify that the negative constraint No drum is a flute only prevents overlap between drums and flutes, leaving violins and guitars free to overlap with flutes in possibility scenarios.
Identify that the negative constraint No drum is a flute only prevents overlap between drums and flutes, leaving violins and guitars free to overlap with flutes in possibility scenarios.
Analyze Statement Relationships
Statements: (1) Some guitars are drums, (2) Some drums are violins, (3) No drum is a flute. This means guitars and violins are linked via drums, but flutes have no restriction relative to guitars or violins.
Evaluate Conclusion (I): No flute is a violin
While no flute is a drum, it is possible for a flute to be a violin (unless stated otherwise). Since this is not a definite consequence, (I) does not follow.
Evaluate Conclusion (II): Some flutes are guitars
There is no direct or indirect information linking flutes and guitars. A flute could potentially be a guitar, but it is not necessary. Therefore, (II) does not follow.
B is incorrect because it falsely assumes some flutes are guitars; C is incorrect because neither conclusion is logically necessary; D is incorrect because the independence of flutes and violins makes the first conclusion invalid.
A is correct because neither conclusion is necessarily true, as the constraints only define the relationship between drums and other categories, not between flutes and the other items.
In Syllogisms, if a negative constraint (No X is Y) is given, always check if the conclusion assumes a relationship that is not strictly forced by the premises; if a 'possibility' exists, a definite conclusion is false.
Get instant step-by-step AI explanations, full shift Previous Year Papers (SSC GD, RRB, SSC JE), and regional rank analysis on the official Examoogle App.
Free Download тАв 100K+ Aspirants